Educational Technologies at Missouri
A division of the Office of the Provost
Concept Mapping in the Virtual Classroom
What is a concept map?
A concept map is a visual representation of the knowledge structures in people’s mind. Concept maps contain a subject where related people, places, concepts, ideas, and facts are hierarchically arranged about the subject. It is a useful tool to brainstorm a topic, issue, or idea and document related information, subtopics, and interrelationships.
Activities where concept maps are useful
- To help you assess student understanding of concepts or progress in understanding concepts
- As a kind of diary in a classroom, which can keep track of student progress and understanding over a period of time
- Guiding classroom discussions
- Assist in the construction of lectures, discussions, and review sessions
How to develop a concept map?
Concept maps can be created using paper and pencil or a software program such as Inspiration.
- Begin with a central topic or idea. This can be a name, place, date, abstract concept such as democracy, etc.
- Branching out from the center, identify key subtopics and surround the central topic. These subtopics are meant to illustrate understanding of the main topic
- These subtopics may have additional related ideas
- Finally, draw links or connections from related topics. These links may need to be labeled to describe the nature or intention of the link
Evaluation criteria
There are 3 main areas in evaluating a concept map. Depending on the nature and purpose of the concept map, additional criteria may be needed.
- Concepts:
– Are the concepts correctly expressed?
– Are the concepts concise? - Inter-relations (links between concepts):
– Are the inter-relations meaningful?
– Are the inter-relations complete? (Are they criss-crossing?) - Organizations:
– Is the entire concept map in hierarchical order?
– Are the concepts in different levels?
Sample Rubric
Exemplary 4 pts. |
Standard 3 pts. |
Adequate 2 pts. |
Unsatisfactory 1 pts. |
|
| Concept and Links | Main ideas and supporting concepts are well documented and illustrate the concept in full detail. Linking words demonstrate superior conceptual understanding; Links are precisely labeled | Main ideas are not well described with some key concepts missing. Linking words easy to follow but at times ideas unclear; Links are not precisely labeled | Main ideas are not well described with many key concepts missing. Linking words are clear but present a flawed rationale; Links are not labeled | There are no supporting concepts. Difficult to follow; No links |
| Organization | Well organized; Logical format; Contains main concepts; Contains a appropriate number of concepts; Map is “treelike” and not stringy; Follows standard map conventions | Thoughtfully organized; Easy to follow most of the time; Contains most of the main concepts; Contains an adequate number of concepts; Follows the standard map conventions | Somewhat organized; Somewhat incoherent; Contains only a few of the main concepts | Choppy and confusing; Contains a limited number of concepts |
Resources
- Concept map using Inspiration software http://www.inspiration.com/Inspiration
- Sample of evaluation rubrics (from http://www.ncsec.org/team11/RubricConceptMap.doc)
